Side note: Ignore the part where they refer to the Chief as “Vice Chief”, I’m not sure how they made such a blatant mistranslation… also, there doesn’t appear to be any information (thus far) to even suggest that Barbarians have a “vice chief” position in their cultural hierarchy.
All we know so far, is that they have a Chief, an undetermined number of “Elders” (who are basically warriors with seniority from the acting Chief’s generation) that are all about the same age as him regardless of their Explorer rank. There is also a Shaman, as well as the Shaman’s apprentice.
When it comes to being a Chief, only strength matters, gender does not. Elders can be both male and female, but so far only males have been shown in the Shaman role, so it’s unknown if that position has a gender bias. However, I assume that role doesn’t have a gender bias, since their only deity (the ancestral goddess) is obviously believed by them to be female.
Dung Eater
Side note: Ignore the part where they refer to the Chief as “Vice Chief”, I’m not sure how they made such a blatant mistranslation… also, there doesn’t appear to be any information (thus far) to even suggest that Barbarians have a “vice chief” position in their cultural hierarchy.
All we know so far, is that they have a Chief, an undetermined number of “Elders” (who are basically warriors with seniority from the acting Chief’s generation) that are all about the same age as him regardless of their Explorer rank. There is also a Shaman, as well as the Shaman’s apprentice.
When it comes to being a Chief, only strength matters, gender does not. Elders can be both male and female, but so far only males have been shown in the Shaman role, so it’s unknown if that position has a gender bias. However, I assume that role doesn’t have a gender bias, since their only deity (the ancestral goddess) is obviously believed by them to be female.
Avalanche
And then they wonder why they are so disrespected, they kill half their Tribe themselves